Legislature(1993 - 1994)

04/14/1993 09:15 AM Senate FIN

Audio Topic
* first hearing in first committee of referral
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
txt
                                                                               
  SENATE BILL NO. 126                                                          
                                                                               
       An  Act  making special  appropriations for  design and                 
       construction  of  power transmission  interties between                 
       Anchorage  and the Kenai  Peninsula, between  Healy and                 
       Fairbanks,  and  between the  Swan  Lake and  Tyee Lake                 
       hydroelectric projects; and providing for an  effective                 
       date.                                                                   
                                                                               
  Co-chair   Pearce   directed  that   SB   106  and   126  be                 
  simultaneously brought  on for  discussion.  Referencing  SB
  106,  she  noted that  at the  March  3, 1993,  meeting, the                 
  committee adopted a draft committee substitute dated 3/2/93.                 
  She then suggested that that action be rescinded in order to                 
  adopt  an updated  draft.   Senator Sharp  MOVED  to rescind                 
  adoption of  the 3/2/93 version.   No objection  having been                 
  raised, prior committee action was RESCINDED.  Senator Sharp                 
  then  directed  attention  to  an  updated  draft  committee                 
  substitute  (8-LS0594\C,  4/13/93,  Cramer)  and  MOVED  for                 
  adoption.     Senator   Kerttula   initially  objected   but                 
  subsequently removed his  objection, and CSSB 106  (Fin) was                 
  ADOPTED.     Senator  Sharp  further  advised   of  proposed                 
  Amendment No. 1.                                                             
                                                                               
  At the request of Co-chair  Pearce, Senator Sharp provided a                 
  sectional review  of  the updated  draft.   (Copies  of  the                 
  sectional analysis are on file in  the original bill file at                 
  the Legislative Finance Division.)                                           
                                                                               
       Sec. 1 sets forth reasons  for enacting the legislation                 
  and expresses legislative intent as to how the program is to                 
  be managed.  It states that power cost equalization is to be                 
  funded for 20  years at $17  million, annually.  Demands  on                 
  the general fund for this program are to decrease to zero by                 
  the year  2000,  or sooner,  since  it is  anticipated  that                 
  revenues from the  fund established by the  legislation will                 
  generate sufficient revenue to reduce general fund demands.                  
                                                                               
       Sec.  2  authorizes  the  Alaska  Energy  Authority  to                 
  contract with utilities to design and construct transmission                 
  lines.  The  utilities assume the risk of  completion costs,                 
  overruns, and all operation and maintenance costs.                           
                                                                               
       Sec. 3  amends the  definition of  program receipts  to                 
  include  earnings  of the  energy  authority  revolving loan                 
  fund.                                                                        
                                                                               
       Sec. 4 provides for Dept. of  Revenue investment of the                 
  balance of the energy authority revolving fund.                              
                                                                               
                                                                               
       Secs.  5  and  6 contain  conforming  amendments making                 
  changes in references to various accounts.                                   
                                                                               
       Sec. 7 creates the energy authority revolving fund.  It                 
  is to become the consolidated fund for all income and assets                 
  of  the  authority   except  for  the   electrical  services                 
  extension fund and the power cost equalization fund.                         
                                                                               
       Secs.  8  through  30  contain  transfers  of  existing                 
  accounts, conforming amendments,  changes in account  names,                 
  and reference changes from funds to accounts.                                
                                                                               
       Sec.   31  authorizes  design  and  construction  of  a                 
  transmission  intertie  between  Anchorage  and  the   Kenai                 
  Peninsula.                                                                   
                                                                               
       Sec.  32  authorizes  design   and  construction  of  a                 
  transmission intertie between Healy and Fairbanks.                           
                                                                               
       Sec. 33 conditions  authorization provided in  Secs. 31                 
  and 32 upon utility company agreement to  pay all completion                 
  costs above $90 million as well as operating and maintenance                 
  costs.                                                                       
                                                                               
       Sec.  34  authorizes  design  and  construction  of   a                 
  transmission  intertie  between  Swan  Lake  and  Tyee  Lake                 
  hydroelectric projects upon utility company agreement to pay                 
  completion  costs  above  $35  million   and  all  costs  of                 
  operation and maintenance.                                                   
                                                                               
       Sec.  35  authorizes  design   and  construction  of  a                 
  transmission  intertie between  Sutton  and Glennallen  with                 
  utility company agreement  to pay costs above  $27.5 million                 
  and all operation and maintenance.   This project is further                 
  conditioned on Office  of Management and Budget  approval of                 
  the feasibility study submitted by the energy authority.                     
                                                                               
       Sec. 36 provides  that AEA  contract with utilities  to                 
  design  and  construct  transmission  interties  unless  the                 
  utilities decline that opportunity.                                          
                                                                               
       Sec. 37 provides for an effective date.                                 
                                                                               
  Senator Kelly questioned language within  Sec. 36 that would                 
  allow AEA to  design and  construct a facility  even if  the                 
  participating  utility  declines.   Senator  Sharp explained                 
  that the language  was intended to cover  situations wherein                 
  the  utility  did  not  wish to  participate  in  design and                 
  construction but  wanted the project and agreed  to pay cost                 
  overruns and debt service.  AEA cannot build facilities that                 
  utilities have not agreed to  operate and maintain.  Senator                 
  Kelly suggested the language requires greater definition.                    
                                                                               
  Senator  Kerttula said he  had no problem  with the intertie                 
                                                                               
                                                                               
  connections or where or  how they are funded.   He stressed,                 
  however, that debt service on  an electrical project is owed                 
  to  the general fund.   The proposed  legislation would make                 
  those  revenues  the  property  of  AEA  (similar  to  AIDEA                 
  capitalization).  He raised public policy concerns regarding                 
  that approach.                                                               
                                                                               
  Senator  Kerttula  further  noted  that  the  proposed  bill                 
  guarantees  nothing for the  power cost equalization program                 
  since provisions for funding at $17 million for 20 years are                 
  stated in intent language only.  He questioned whether a set                 
  amount would cover population increases in rural Alaska over                 
  that time period.                                                            
                                                                               
  Senator Sharp acknowledged that all future expenditures from                 
  the revolving fund  would have  to be  authorized by  future                 
  legislatures,  including   power  cost  equalization.     He                 
  directed attention to a spread sheet tracking bill proposals                 
  from 1993 through 2003 and explained that provision of rural                 
  technology assistance funding  is intended to  allow present                 
  PCE recipients to modify facilities "to  get off of PCE over                 
  the same period of time."                                                    
                                                                               
  In response  to a  question from  Senator Rieger  concerning                 
  funding  for  intertie construction,  Senator  Sharp advised                 
  that  Amendment  No.  1 would  change  troublesome  wording.                 
  Senator Rieger voiced his understanding that the legislation                 
  specifies  the  total  cost as  well  as  the  amount to  be                 
  provided by utilities.                                                       
                                                                               
  Further discussion  of interest  rates for  various projects                 
  followed between Senator Rieger and Senator Sharp.                           
                                                                               
  Senator Rieger directed attention to Page  7, Lines 2 and 3,                 
  and questioned authority ability to  "enter into agreements,                 
  with  respect  to  the  revolving  fund, that  it  considers                 
  necessary to secure  its bonds."   Senator Sharp voiced  his                 
  understanding   that   the   forgoing  represents   standard                 
  procedures.                                                                  
                                                                               
  Senator Sharp MOVED  for adoption of  Amendment No. 1.   Co-                 
  chair Pearce  voiced OBJECTION to  both Amendment No.  1 and                 
  No.  2.  She then called for  a show of hands on the motion.                 
  Amendment No. 1 was ADOPTED on a vote of  5 to 1.  (Co-chair                 
  Pearce  opposed  the  motion,  and  Co-chair Frank  was  not                 
  present during the vote.)                                                    
                                                                               
  Senator Sharp MOVED  for adoption of  Amendment No. 2.   Co-                 
  chair Pearce OBJECTED and again called  for a show of hands.                 
  Amendment No. 2 was ADOPTED on a vote of 5 to 1.   (Co-chair                 
  Pearce was opposed,  and Co-chair Frank was  absent from the                 
  meeting.)                                                                    
                                                                               
  Co-chair Pearce  announced her  intent to HOLD  the bill  in                 
                                                                               
                                                                               
  committee for further discussion  but suggested that  public                 
  comment begin at this time.                                                  
                                                                               
  CLAYTON HURLESS,  General Manager,  Copper Valley  Electric,                 
  came before committee.  He explained that CVE serves a large                 
  geographic  area  in   Southcentral  Alaska  (Glennallen  to                 
  Valdez).  Members pay the highest  unsubsidized rates in the                 
  state.      (Residential   consumers   in   Glennallen   pay                 
  approximately  21  cents  per  kilowatt   hour.)    CVE  has                 
  attempted, for a number of years, to find a solution to high                 
  costs.  Connection  to the railbelt electrical  system would                 
  provide much lower  cost power from "a  tremendous surplus."                 
  Mr. Hurless noted railbelt support for CVE's endeavors.                      
                                                                               
  CVE is at a critical point in that the productive capability                 
  of the Solomon Gulch hydroelectric plant, owned by the state                 
  and operated by CVE,  will be completely "used up  in 1993."                 
  Additional needs  beyond that  load will have  to be  served                 
  from   supplemental   resources--two  aged   diesel  plants.                 
  Considerable capital  expenditure will  have to  be made  if                 
  these plants are  to meet power  needs.  The intertie  would                 
  avoid  that major  expenditure as well  as the  obvious rate                 
  impact.                                                                      
                                                                               
  Mr. Hurless said  he was  familiar with  changes within  the                 
  legislation  and  said  that  of  all proposals  before  the                 
  legislature, the present approach serves Copper Valley best.                 
  He urged passage of CSSB 106 as amended by committee.                        
                                                                               
  MIKE  KELLY,   General  Manager,  Golden   Valley  Electric,                 
  Fairbanks,  next  came before  committee  in support  of the                 
  railbelt interties.   He noted that the railbelt energy fund                 
  has  dwindled  from  approximately   $200  million  to  $120                 
  million.  Utilities in the railbelt have gone from potential                 
  100% grant funding to the  present agreement whereby utility                 
  members would pay 50% of the cost of the interties plus  any                 
  cost overruns.                                                               
                                                                               
  Mr. Kelly voiced support  for CSSB 106 as amended  and urged                 
  that it be passed to the Senate for a floor vote.                            
                                                                               
  ADJOURNMENT                                                                  
                                                                               
  The meeting was adjourned at approximately 10:10 a.m.                        
                                                                               

Document Name Date/Time Subjects